प्रमाणानुपपत्युपपत्तिभ्याम्॥
pramāṇānupapatyupapattibhyām.
The objector switches targets, arguing that if perception requires the contact of a sense-organ with an object, then perception is impossible when objects are separated by space or obstacles.
Perception was treated as an un-testable, magical link between the brain and objects.
Perception was analyzed down to the physical properties of light vectors, material density, and spatial tracking constraints.
COGNITIVE PHILOSOPHY RUNTIME
Hardware input boundary testing. The opponent attempts to break the perception controller by introducing spatial distance and physical occlusion exceptions.
HISTORICAL COMMENTARY ANALYSIS
The opponent launches a tactical attack directly at Pratyakṣa (Perception). They argue that if perception requires physical contact, then you can never see things that are far away, behind a glass window, or blocked by a wall, which means perception is a broken, limited hardware interface.
[ SYSTEM VERIFIED ]
│
▼
[ DELUSION REMOVED ]
│
▼
[ LOGIC OVERRIDE ]