न, साध्यसमत्वात्॥
na, sādhyasamatvāt.
Gautama refutes the materialist objection: This is untenable because your claim that raw visible nature accounts for initial systemic variations is an unproven assumption that begs the question.
Ancient thinkers did not know how to identify circular reasoning in scientific or material arguments.
Nyāya constructed explicit formal classifications for circular arguments, throwing them out of the compilation pipeline automatically.
COGNITIVE PHILOSOPHY RUNTIME
Validation variable check fail. Rejecting an adversarial explanation because it relies on an unverified default randomizer variable to bypass causal sequence tracking.
HISTORICAL COMMENTARY ANALYSIS
Gautama flags a logical fallacy (Sādhya-Sama / Petitio Principii). The opponent assumes that raw atomic chance explains why one child is born healthy and another is born with severe structural defects. Gautama points out that since blind physical elements should behave identically under the same laws, initial variation remains a bug in their theory. It demands a distinct causal historical payload.
[ SYSTEM VERIFIED ]
│
▼
[ DELUSION REMOVED ]
│
▼
[ LOGIC OVERRIDE ]