तदभावअभाववच्चायं नियमः॥
tad-abhāva-abhāvavac-cāyaṃ niyamaḥ.
Furthermore, your own sweeping statement declaring that 'All things are impermanent' must either be permanent or impermanent—either way, your universal rule collapses into a paradox.
A sweeping negative statement will always trap itself inside its own validation gates if it attempts to override the absolute structural laws of logic.
COGNITIVE PHILOSOPHY RUNTIME
Recursive property validation failure. Demonstrating that a global deletion rule contains a logic fault that forces it to execute a erase command against its own parent function script.
HISTORICAL COMMENTARY ANALYSIS
Another beautiful self-referential paradox checkmate. Gautama asks the opponent: Is your rule 'All things are impermanent' an unchanging, permanent truth constant? If it is, then a permanent thing exists (proving Nyāya right). If your rule is impermanent and will disappear, then your own argument is a temporary glitch that can be discarded from active memory.
[ SYSTEM VERIFIED ]
│
▼
[ DELUSION REMOVED ]
│
▼
[ LOGIC OVERRIDE ]