व्याहतत्वात् अहेतुः॥
vyāhatatvāt ahetuḥ.
Gautama refutes this: Your argument is a logical failure; if the component parts did not exist as real foundations, their disassembly could never cause the whole object to disappear.
Taking a machine apart proves the machine was an illusion the whole time it was running.
Taking it apart proves it has an explicit design layout. While the components are structurally locked under geometry rules, an authentic new entity configuration is online.
COGNITIVE PHILOSOPHY RUNTIME
Dependency resolution proof. Confirming that a destructive method call can only return a success status if the target composite entity was successfully initialized in memory space.
HISTORICAL COMMENTARY ANALYSIS
Gautama drops a definitive structural reality checkmate. If the cloth were a non-existent illusion, you couldn't pull threads out of it in the first place. The very act of pulling a part out of a whole proves that the whole structure was online and real. Disassembly requires assembly. The reductionist argument contains a self-destruct logic loop.
[ SYSTEM VERIFIED ]
│
▼
[ DELUSION REMOVED ]
│
▼
[ LOGIC OVERRIDE ]